If you are a diehard fan of the Nike shoe sneakers, you have probably come across the Roshe and Tanjun. Unfortunately, these sneakers have various similarities, making it difficult to choose between them. Fortunately for you, this article will compare the Nike Tanjun and the Nike Roshe to determine which one has the upper hand. But before diving deeper into the detailed comparison, it will be helpful to learn a bit of the background of the shoes. Below is an overview of the sneakers in question.
Roshe Vs Tanjun: Overview
When Nike first launched the Roshe running shoes for the first time globally, many individuals in the company were skeptical of the design. However, the shoe performed admirably in the market. Many buyers were instantly won over by its straightforward design and unrivaled flexibility.
The shoe was mainly designed for running. However, it is suitable for other physical activities or even easy tasks such as walking. The trick behind its minimal design was created to guarantee that no additional design interfered with the shoe’s functionality. Having no added styles on its constructions, buyers quickly noticed how simple yet flexible and comfortable the shoe was.
After years of Roshe’s solo reign, Nike unveiled another shoe that could challenge the other running shoes from different brands. Tanjun had one of the most successful Nike running shoe releases in history. Aesthetically and physically, the shoe doesn’t differ much from the Roshe. It features simple construction and design that is borrowed from Roshe. The running shoe was a great way for Nike to improve the Roshe and give the consumers what they wanted. And Tanjun did precisely that.
Many people, however, will not be able to differentiate between the two running shoes without taking a detailed look at both of them. So, let’s dive into the comparison of the two.
Roshe Vs Tanjun: Outsole Style
The Roshe’s outsole features some flex grooves that permit you to make more natural movements without experiencing restrictions. In addition, because of the design of the lug sole, the shoe has an increased traction ability. It is also very comfortable and durable. However, the shoe lacks enough cushioning as one would have preferred.
The lack of a separate outsole from the midsole is one of Tanjun’s distinguishing features that some people may find unusual. The midsole and the outsole are one body. The shoe is much lighter than the Roshe because of this design. However, the combined outsole and midsole’s durability is significantly lower.
Tanjun’s running shoe’s outsole is devoid of rubber components. Roshe, on the other hand, takes pride in their outsoles’ waffle lug shape, which allows for traction.
Roshe Vs Tanjun: Traction Ability
As you might expect, the Nike Tanjun’s traction performance is hampered by the lack of rubber in the outsole. As a result, this shoe is best suited to indoor workouts or short-distance running outside. So, how does Tanjun provide for traction? Tanjun’s outsole is made of EVA foam rather than rubber, which is sticky enough to provide you with the traction you need while jogging or walking.
On the other hand, Roshe’s waffle lug pattern on the outsole provides all the grip needed for running outside or indoors. So even if you walk or run in slick areas, you will not slip. Anywhere and everywhere, the Roshe running shoe feels comfortable and robust.
The Nike Roshe’s midsole is made out of Phylon and EVA foam. The material offers sufficient cushioning for your daily activities. They feel soft and comfortable. Because EVA foam soles are light, the shoes are ideal for jogging on flat surfaces. Phylon is both flexible and durable at the same time. So you can’t go wrong with the Nike Roshe’s midsole.
The Nike Tanjun, on the other hand, does not feature a distinct outsole and midsole, as previously stated. Instead, the entire sole is made of EVA foam. However, you will still enjoy a lot of impact absorption and comfort.
The materials of the uppers
The uppers of the Nike Roshe are made up of a mixture of both suede and mesh. Because of all the possible ventilation, the mesh material permits free air circulation that keeps your feet feeling cool. It also aids in the better fitting of shoes around your foot. The suede component of the upper adds to the shoe’s aesthetic value. Furthermore, it also aids in providing some water resistance.
Nike Tanjun, on the other hand, features a nylon mesh upper. The mesh resembles that in Roshe in appearance. However, it has diamond-shaped holes. Though the upper lacks a lace cage, the shoe is comfortable and does not feel awkward at all.
None of the two shoes has a complete waterproof ability. Since the uppers are made of a mesh material, water can easily penetrate. However, due to their high ventilating capacity, your socks and feet will dry quickly after water exposure.
However, it would be correct to state that Roshe has a slightly higher water-resistant capability than Tanjun. That is because Roshe features suede on its upper, absorbing water and moisture at a higher rate to keep your feet dry.
The mesh material uppers on both Tanjun and Roshe promote airflow from the heels to the toe. Hence both sneakers are breathable. Lack of ventilation leads to a build-up of moisture caused by sweat. Breathability will keep your feet comfortable and dry even after a vigorous workout or running. However, the disadvantage of extreme breathability is that you can not wear your sneakers when it is cold or raining outside.
Benefits of Roshe
Great value for your money
Admirable color options
It is a comfortable shoe
Disadvantages of Roshe
The suede material gets dirty easily
Poor arch support
Benefits of Tanjun
Easy to clean
They are comfortable
Improved cushioning capacity
They provide a sleek look
Disadvantages of Tanjun
Lacks water-resistant features
The outsole is less durable
If we had to come up with a winner from the comparison, we’d go with the Nike Roshe. That’s because it’s more durable than Tanjun and has minor water resistance characteristics.
However, you have to keep in mind that Tanjun is a fantastic running shoe that you will not be disappointed with. Even without rubber outsoles, it is comfortable and provides adequate traction.